TMI Blog2016 (8) TMI 1023X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sition of penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/-on the appellants by the Commissioner (Appeals), Delhi-II vide the impugned order dated 15.03.2007. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Pan Masala liable to central excise duty. They were availing credit on various inputs in terms of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 in terms of provisions of Rule 9(A) of the said Rules, the appellants are to file an Annual ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... it is pointed by the ld. Counsel for the appellant that the show cause notice invoked Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules not the Rules under which the penalty was imposed by the Original Authority. 3. A perusal of the original order as well as the impugned order nowhere reveals that reason for applying Rule 15 in the present proceedings. It is seen that in a similar set of fact ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|