TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 1181X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Excise Act. This Court had, in Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-I vs. Vijay Kumar Arora [2015 (2) TMI 608 - DELHI HIGH COURT], held that the appeals are not maintainable. In these circumstances of the case relying upon the Supreme Court judgment in Navin Chemicals Mfg. and Trading Co. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, [1993 (9) TMI 107 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] it is, therefore, held that the app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at the question of clubbing of clearances directly relates to valuation falls within the exclusive domain of the Supreme Court under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act. 3. This Court had, by its order dated 28.01.2015 in CEAC 106-109/2014 (Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-I vs. Vijay Kumar Arora), held that the appeals are not maintainable. In these circumstances of the case relying u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|