9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (9) TMI 617X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... PDS Legal, for the Petitioner Mr. Beni Chatterjee, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, Mr. M. S. Bhardwaj, Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Ms. Neeta V. Masurkar, Mr. S. G. Thakur, for the Respondents ORDER P. C. Heard both sides. The order passed and contained in several communications is impugned in the Writ Petitions for it purports to deny the Petitioners, the deemed export drawback under All ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t at no stage, the Petitioners were given a proper opportunity of being heard nor the impugned order is passed based on their written representations and points raised during oral hearing. 4. The request of the Petitioner is denied only by addressing some letters and which outlines the stand of the Respondents emanating from the Development Commissioner SEEPZ, Special Economic Zone. This hardly s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is a refund application under the duty draw back and for the relevant period. The claim of the Petitioner is that the supplies made from the domestic tariff unit to the export oriented unit are eligible for refund on All Industry Draw Back Rate and draw back application should be processed accordingly. 7. The Petitioner complained throughout that they have not heard anything from the authorities. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... c Zone, Mumbai himself will now grant a personal hearing to the Petitioner and on perusal of all the records pass a proper reasoned order on the draw back application within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. We accept this statement of Mr. Jetly as an undertaking to this Court and clarify that we have not examined the rival contentions insofar as merits of the draw bac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
