9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 33X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndran, Member (Technical) Mr. Ravindra Kr. Advocate for the Appellants Sh. Amit Singh, Advocate for the D.A. Sh. Govind Dixit, DR for Revenue Ms. Reena Khair, Sh. Rajesh Sharma, Ms. Rita Jha, (Advocates) for the Interested Parties ORDER Per: B. Ravichandran. The present appeal is filed by the appellant who is an exporter of Plain Medium Density Fiber Board (subject goods) from Malaysia. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gin in such situation is considered as if in the fresh investigation, it was also submitted that non termination of investigation against the appellant in the initial stage was not challenged by them. 4. The Ld. Counsel for the DA supported the findings of the DA. He also submitted that the DA considered the Appellate Panel Report on Treatment of Exporters with de minimis volume. Consistent with ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rted in 2016 (334) FLT 552 (Tri. Del). The injury analysis was challenged as faulty as un-dumped imports from Robin Resources have been taken into account for purpose of injury determination which is contrary to the WTO Panel Report in the case of EC Salman wherein it has been held that investigations are to be terminated qua, the exporter whose exports are found to be de-minzmis. The Tribunal aft ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... spects of original investigation and in addition examined whether expiry of initial Notification is likely to lead a recurrence of dumping/ injury to the DI. As already noted that this is like a fresh investigation in so far as appellant is concerned and we find no legal infirmity in such action by the DAV We also note that the non-termination of investigation with reference to appellant during fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
