2016 (11) TMI 618

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Sri Chinmay J. Mirji, learned Central Government Counsel to accept notice for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. He is permitted to file memo of appearance in four weeks. 2. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 1-12-2014 at Annexure-J to the petition. In that light, the petitioner is seeking that respondent No. 3 be directed to grant the scrip for the full quantum of exports as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ad been furnished and the respondents at the first instance had taken note of all these aspects of the matter and the grant of authorization in that regard was made, the amount was cut down to Rs. 3,70,007/-. The balance amount has not been considered is the grievance. Despite the same, the respondents without assigning any reasons have rejected the claim of the petitioner through the communicatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... icated. The petitioner contends that the necessary documents have been submitted. 6. In that background, a perusal of the communication dated 1-12-2014 would disclose that the respondents have informed the petitioner that the amount paid is after restricting the growth rate to 25% as per the public notice dated 25-9-2013. Insofar as the rejection, the respondents have neither adverted to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X