TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 618X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cting the growth rate to 25% as per the public notice dated 25-9-2013. Insofar as the rejection, the respondents have neither adverted to the documents and the details that had been furnished by the petitioner nor any reasons for application of mind in that regard is indicated in the communication at Annexure-J dated 1-12-2014 - the communication dated 1-12-2014 would not be sustainable. The rejec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cted to grant the scrip for the full quantum of exports as per the petitioner s eligibility as claimed in their letter dated 2-4-2015 as at Annexure-K to the petition. 3. The petitioner-company is a Merchant Importer engaged in the trade and export of fish meal. The petitioner contends that as per the one trade policy announced in terms of the Foreign Trade Development Regulation Act, 1999, amo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ejected the claim of the petitioner through the communication dated 1-12-2014. It is in that light, the petitioner is before this Court. 5. A perusal of the petition papers in the background of the contention put forth, the very nature of the consideration as made by the respondents would disclose that though a claim of ₹ 45,28,896/- is made by the petitioner, the further scrutiny in that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as the rejection, the respondents have neither adverted to the documents and the details that had been furnished by the petitioner nor any reasons for application of mind in that regard is indicated in the communication at Annexure-J dated 1-12-2014. 7. Hence, to the said extent, the communication dated 1-12-2014 would not be sustainable. The rejection as made therein is set aside. The responde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|