9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (10) TMI 669X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed against the Order-in-Appeal No: SVS/327/NGP-I-/2006, dated 16-10-2006 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur. 2. None appeared on behalf of the respondent despite notice nor there is any request for adjournment. Since the issue involved in this case is in a narrow compass the appeal is taken up for disposal in the absence of any representation from the respondent. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aid on mobile phones is eligible, relying upon the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Indian Rayon Industries Ltd. v. CCE, Bhavnagar - 2006 (4) S.T.R. 79. The Commissioner (Appeals) has reproduced the relevant para of the Tribunal s order which is as under : 6.3 The issue involved is no more res integra having been settled by the Hon ble CESTAT, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai by decision repo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y, 2005, during which the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 were applicable. 4. I find that Rule 4(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 states that credit in respect of inputs may be taken on receipt of the inputs in the factory of the manufacturer or in the premises of the provider of output service. But no such stipulation regarding the premises of the provider of output service. But no such stipulati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... manufacturers. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential benefit to the appellants. (Dictated and pronounced in Court) 6.4 Following the ratio of the above decision, after allowing waiver application, I pass the following order. 5. I find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has correctly followed the law as has been laid down by the Tribunal i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
