9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 1090X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e order dated 31-8-2015 needs to be rectified and the phrase “(Dictated in Court)” shall be replaced by phrase “(Operative portion of the order pronounced in open Court)” - The 2nd error which sought to be rectified is that the cause title dated 31-8-2015 indicates that the respondent is Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai while it should be CCE Pune III - Held that: - we do find that the respo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sought to be rectified by Revenue is that in the said final order dated 31-8-2015 which was pronounced in the Court, a reference was made to (Paragraph No. 6.3) of Final Order No. A/2996/2015, dated 8-9-2015. It is the submission of the Revenue that the final order dated 31-8-2015 can be only after 8-9-2015. 3.1 It is seen from the records that the matter was heard on 31-8-2015. The note sheet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... title dated 31-8-2015 indicates that the respondent is Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai while it should be CCE Pune III. 4.1 On perusal of the records, we do find that the respondent is CCE Pune III which seems to be an inadvertent typographical error. Accordingly, we rectify the same and indicate that the respondent in Final Order No. A/3154/2015/EB, dated 31-8-2015 will be CCE Pune II ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
