Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2002 (3) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re
Judge(s) : S. RAJENDRA BABU., K. G. BALAKRISHNAN. and P. VENKATARAMA REDDI. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by P. VENKATARAMA REDDI J.-The opinion recorded by the Kerala High Court in I.T.R. No. 16 of 1997 (see [2000] 243 ITR 362), has given rise to this appeal filed by the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1985-86. At the instance of the Revenue, the following question was referred under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of the High Court: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law and fact in holding that Rs.3,02,758 cannot be brought to tax and in deleting the addition of Rs.3,02,758 sustained by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... come-tax (Appeals) held that there was no justification to include the sums which were already included in the course of reassessments made for the years 1979-80 and 1980-81. However, he upheld the addition of Rs.3,02,758 pertaining to the assessment year 1978-79. The Appellate Commissioner held that the liability of the assessee finally ceased during the year 1985-86 in view of the rejection of the S.L.P. in Neroth Oil Mills' case [1982] 49 STC 249 (Ker), in November, 1984. Certain observations were also made as regards the includibility of the sums pertaining to the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82 in respect of which reassessments were made. However, in this appeal, we need not go into the details thereof. On further appeal by the a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Tribunal and held that section 41(1) cannot be invoked in the instant case. Hence, this appeal by the Revenue by special leave. It may be noted that the provision was made in the books of account towards purchase tax which was under dispute and the benefit of deduction from business income was availed of in the past years in relation thereto. The same was sought to be reversed by the assessee during the year ending on March 31, 1985, for whatever reason it be. The question is whether the circumstances contemplated by section 41(1) exist so as to enable the Revenue to take back what has been allowed earlier as business expenditure and to include such amount in the income of the relevant assessment year, i.e., 1985 86. In order to apply s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... de by the Tribunal. Nor can it be said that the reasons given by the Tribunal are irrelevant. The learned senior counsel appearing for the Income-tax Department has contended that the assessee itself took steps to write off the liability on account of purchase tax by making necessary adjustments in the books, which itself is indicative of the fact that the liability ceased for all practical purposes and therefore, the addition of the amount of Rs.3,20,758 deeming the same as income of the year 1985-86 under section 41(1) is well justified of the Act. But, what the assessee has done is not conclusive. As observed by the Tribunal, a unilateral action on the part of the assessee by way of writing-off the liability in its accounts does not ne .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates