9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 693X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent could have granted some more time or passed an order either accepting or rejecting the request for adjournment. This has not been done by the respondent. Thus, there has been a violation of the principles of natural justice in the manner, in which, the assessment has been completed - this Court is not inclined to set aside the impugned assessment order, as partial relief has been granted to th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner : Ms.Radhika Chandra Sekhar For the Respondent : Mr.K.Venkatesh, GA ORDER Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner, which is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 200 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dent as could be seen from the endorsement in the office copy of the letter. 4. However, the respondent issued a notice dated 25.9.2015 proposing to revise the assessment, after which, one more revision notice was issued on 25.10.2016. In the third revision notice, the petitioner was granted 10 days time to submit their objections and appear for a personal hearing. On receipt of the notice, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s, which were produced by the petitioner along with the letter dated 27.10.2016. If that be the case, the respondent could have granted some more time or passed an order either accepting or rejecting the request for adjournment. This has not been done by the respondent. Thus, there has been a violation of the principles of natural justice in the manner, in which, the assessment has been completed. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
