9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 878X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y to the law laid down by this Court in Calcutta Discount Limited Company vs. Incom Tax Officer, Companies District I, Calcutta & Anr.[1960 (11) TMI 8 - SUPREME Court]. We, thus, set aside the impugned judgments and remit the cases to the respective High Courts to decide the writ petitions on merits. We may make it clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the cases, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... da Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Ajay Vohra, Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha, Adv. Mr. Udit Naresh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Gautam,Adv. Mr. Subramanium Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Ramesh,Adv. Mr. V. Vasudevan, Adv. Mr. V. Ramasubramanian,Adv. Mr. B. Ramaswamy, Adv. Mr. T. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv. Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv. Mr. Govind Manoharan, Adv. Ms. Shruti Iyer, Adv. Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 11212/2016, C.A. No. 11213/2016, C.A. No. 11214/2016, C.A. No. 11215/2016, C.A. No. 11216/2016, C.A. No. 11217/2016, C.A. No. 11218/2016, C.A. No. 11219/2016, C.A. No. 11220/2016, C.A. No. 11221/2016, C.A. No. 11222/2016, C.A. No. 11223/2016, C.A. No. 11224/2016, C.A. No. 11225/2016, C.A. No. 11226-11228/2016, C.A. No. 11229/2016 and C.A. No. 11230/2016 ORDER We have heard learned counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e it clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the cases, i.e. the contentions which are raised by the appellant challenging the move of the Income Tax Authorities to re-open the assessment. Each case shall be examined on its own merits keeping in view the scope of judicial review while entertaining such matters, as laid down by this Court in various judgments. We are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
