Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (12) TMI 1068

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on Service” for transport terminals can be applied to the commercial portion of the ISBT? - Held that: - in terms of Section 65(25b) of Finance Act, 1994, the taxable service does not include such service provided in respect of the roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams. Admittedly, ISBT is transport terminal which is clearly excluded from the definition of “Comm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Housing Board for construction of Sarnath Commercial Complex and Satellite Plaza Commercial Complex The proceedings initiated against the respondent for recovery of service tax concluded by the Original Authority, who confirmed demand of ₹ 8,26,060/- with reference to construction of M.P. Housing Board and dropped the demand of ₹ 15,53,555/- with reference to construction of commercial .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that in terms of Section 65(25b) of Finance Act, 1994, the taxable service does not include such service provided in respect of the roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams. Admittedly, ISBT is transport terminal which is clearly excluded from the definition of "Commercial or Industrial Construction Service" for service tax purposes. When the construction of ISBT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the respondent, we find no justification in the plea of the Revenue for another payment of service tax by the respondent. We note that in the respondent's own case, on an identical situation, the appeal by the Revenue was rejected vide Final Order No.A/50671 of 2014 dated 21.02.2014. 5. In view of the above discussions and analysis, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates