Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (1) TMI 1282

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nward freight is specifically covered in the amended definition of ‘input service’ as contained in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules - reliance placed in the case of CCE, Nagpur Versus Ultratech Cement Ltd. [2010 (10) TMI 13 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - credit allowed - appeal allowed - decided in favor of assessee.
Shri S.S Garg, Judicial Member Shri K. Hariharan, CA, For the Appellant Shri Moh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndirectly for the manufacture of final products or activities relating to the business. For the quarter April to June 2011, the appellant filed a refund claim of ₹ 5,79,014/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Seventy Nine Thousand and Fourteen only) representing unutilized cenvat credit as per Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification 5/2006 dated 14.03.2006. The entire refund was sanc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... service' in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 as the same relates to inward freight but the Commissioner (Appeals) has wrongly considered the same as outward freight examining the transport bills. He further submitted that in the subsequent adjudication, service tax paid on clearing charges has been allowed as refund. He also submitted that the Commissioner (Appeals) in the appellant's ear .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .T.R. 444 (Kar.-HC) (vii) ANZ International Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore [2008 (224) E.L.T. 573 (Tri.-Bang.)] ANZ decision was subsequently upheld by Karnataka High Court in [2009 (233) E.L.T. 40 (Kar.)] and SLP was dismissed by Hon'ble Supreme Court [2009 (240) E.L.T. A16 (S.C)] 4. On the other hand the learned AR reiterated the findings of the impugned order. 5. After considering th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates