2012 (4) TMI 708

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Mathew John, Member (T)]. - The Applicants have filed this application for rectification of mistakes in Final Order No. 1057/2011-EX, dated 21-12-2011 [2012 (278) E.L.T. 683 (Tri.)] issued disposing of the above stay petition and appeal. 2. We have heard the ld. Counsel for the Applicants who were the respondents in the appeal and ld. AR fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... So the following corrections are ordered in different paragraphs of the order issued as indicated below. 4.1 In para 1 of the order. For the sentence,- "So the requirement of pre-deposit was waived and the appeal itself was taken up for hearing with consent of both sides.", the following sentence,- "So the prayer of Revenue for staying the impugned order was rejected and the appeal its .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that these are two different periods and the latter period is only one day with less than the minimum of 15 days prescribed in Rule 10 and abatement cannot be given on account of that day. Aggrieved by the decision of the adjudicating authority Respondents filed an appeal with Commissioner (Appeals) who held that the two periods constitute one single continuous period and allowed the appeal. Aggr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X