9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (4) TMI 1161X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the lookout notice dated 1-9-2010 the authority of which has been continued and reiterated in subsequent letters and communications infringes his right to travel abroad and also enjoyment of his life. Held that: - The rational for the lookout notice which was to facilitate the detention order pursuant to the provisions of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rity of law and against the judgment and order of this Court dated 30-4-2013 quashing the detention order in W.P.(Crl.) No. 410/2013. 2. The facts necessary for the purpose of these proceedings are that an order of detention was issued on 27-8-2010 against the petitioner based upon the allegations of smuggling articles valued over and above ₹ 24.68 crores. This order was apparently mad ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rt was of the opinion that the failure to place the retraction notice/letter on the record depriving its consideration by the authority vitiated the order. The Customs authority had apparently carried matter in Crl. M.P. No. 2407/2012 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 4. The petitioner's grievance is that despite the quashing of the detention, he is subjected to harassment. It is urged that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has considered the submissions of the parties. It is evident from the record that the detention order made on 27-8-2010 was the basis for the lookout notice issued in this case. The petitioner was undoubtedly detained and feeling aggrieved approached this Court on 30-4-2013. After taking into consideration the submissions of the parties, the Division Bench quashed the detention order. On that dat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
