9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (3) TMI 787X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ev Kaushik, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : M.M. Kumar, J.]. - The prayer made in this petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for quashing of order dated 28-11-2006 (Annexure P.9) passed by the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade (Respondent No. 1) under proviso to Section 15 read with Section 13 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ign Trade within a period of 45 days and accordingly the appeal, which was filed on 11-10-2004, was apparently within the period of 45 days and, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. He has further submitted that the other basis for dismissing the appeal is that the petitioner had not disclosed before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (for short, 'the BIFR') ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... anjeev Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondents could not successfully rebut the factual statements borne out from the record and the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. After hearing learned counsel, we find merit in the argument raised in support of the petition, the appeal is well within limitation as it was filed within 45 days. Moreover, it is a case where the wai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
