9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 1168X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any literature/documents/ evidence to support its assertions - Appeal dismissed. - E/2179, 2184 and 2362/2007-EX(DB) - Final Order Nos. A/51010-51012/2016-EX(DB) - Dated:- 4-3-2016 - Shri S.K. Mohanty, Member (J) and R.K. Singh, Member (T) None, for the Appellant. Shri S. Nanthuk, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : R.K. Singh, Member (T)]. - Appeals have been filed against orders-in-appeal which upheld the order-in-original Nos. 134-135 issued in respect of 3 SCNs listed below - Sl. Show Cause Notice No. and Date Amount of Duty Demanded Period 01 BEC/SCN/SEC-C/R-III/93/576, dated 28-7-93 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 369522/- 8474.00 10% 8431.00 25% 04 24/30-4-93 -do- 337365/- 8474.00 10% 8431.00 25% 05 28/31-5-93 Guard for Gearing 166000/- 8474.00 10% 8431.00 20% 06 34/30-6-93 Roller Table for Bridge Scraper 137575/- 8474.00 10% 8431.00 25% 07 48/30-7-93 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ring charges) 450000/- 8503.00 10% 8537.00 20% 3. When the case was called today, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. We find that even on the earlier occasion on 30-11-2015 there was no representation but at that time a letter was received from the appellant seeking adjournment which was granted. As there is no request for adjournment, also the time, we proceed to decide the appeal on merit. 4. We have perused the records and heard ld. DR. We find that the primary adjudication order as also the impugned orders-in-appeal are speaking orders and cannot be said to have been passed summarily. The orders rationally discuss the natu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
