TMI BlogCenvat credit on Weighbridge differenceX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Cenvat credit on Weighbridge difference X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... No. 876/14/2008-CX, dated 20-10-2008 Reply By MUKUND THAKKAR: The Reply: your product please ... Reply By Aitha RajyaLakshmi: The Reply: Cement. In respect or raw material, what is the % of Weighbridge difference that is allowed for availing Cenvat Credit? Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Modvat/Cenvat - Inputs gone in waste - Credit on inputs gone in waste during process of repacking of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... detergent powder not deniable The Supreme Court Bench comprising Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Ruma Pal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan on 7-10-2002 after condoning the delay dismissed the Civil Appeal No. D17281 of 2002 filed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi against CEGAT Order No. A/373/2002-NB, dated 7-3-2002 and reported in 2002 (150) E.L.T. 175 (Tri. - Del.) = 2002 (3) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DELHI (Commissioner v. I.P.F. Vikram India Ltd.). While dismissing the appeal, the Supreme Court passed the following order :- "Delay condoned. The civil appeal is dismissed on merits". The Appellate Tribunal in its impugned order had held that for the purpose of Modvat, where process of repacking the bulk detergent powder into small containers amounts to manufacture, credit on inputs gone in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... waste during the process not deniable. [Commissioner v. I.P.F. Vikram India Ltd. - 2003 (153) E.L.T. A303 (S.C.) = 2002 (10) TMI 791 - SUPREME COURT] Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Clear-cut percentage is not available. In view of the decision of the Supreme Court and Board's circular, analogy can be applied. Reply By YAGAY AND SUN: The Reply: Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur Ve ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rsus M/s. ACC Ltd.
Reply By KASTURI SETHI:
The Reply:
Thanks to M/S. YAGAY AND SUN for posting specific case law. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|