TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 614X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vices? - Held that: - even though appellant furnished the details of the service tax paid by the main contractor, and even though both main contractor as well as the appellant belongs to the same tax division, the adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals) did not take any effort to verify the same. They have blankly upheld the demand raised in the SCN - the main contractor has discharged t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espect of the very same services. 2. At the time of hearing, the Ld. AR She. P.S. Reddy submitted that the appellant has not furnished details to establish that the main contractor has discharged the service tax liability. To this, the Ld. Counsel Sh. Y. Sreenivasa Reddy appearing for the appellant adverted to the audit objection report dated 29.10.2010. The appellants vide letter dated 14.08.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the service tax department on this contract as the service tax is paid on the total value by the main contractor. In support of the above submission regarding the payment of service tax by the main contractor we encloses herein the information evidencing the payment of service tax by the main contractor. And also giving the month wise details of the contract for your kind consideration. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7,858 7,55,11,885 77, 77,724 Total Service Tax paid details are as follows: on 19.02.2010 paid Rs.10,10,118 on 31.03.2010 paid Rs.48,36,481 on 06.07.2010 paid Rs.15,51,370 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|