9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (2) TMI 603X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 40 (for short 'the Act') against the order and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Bikaner in civil misc. case No. 40/94 modifying the award passed by the sole Arbitrator on 15-1-1994. 2. The officer, after presentation of this appeal, computed the period of limitation and made a report that the appeal was barred by time by 79 days. 3. Faced with this dilemma the appellant f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt 1353 for the observations made therein in order to substantiate his averments. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent very vehemently contested the application and opposed teeth and nail condonation of delay sought by the appellant. Learned counsel has submitted that the appellant has not furnished a reasonable explanation for delay in filing the appeal. Merely making bald allegations that f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not shown to this Court that the appeal could not be presented within the period of limitation in spite of due reasonable steps were taken in the matter. The counsel for the appellant has relied upon a decision reported in State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani, (1996) 3 JT (SC) 371 and has contended that a pragmatic approach may be taken in the matter while considering the procedural delay caused in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
