Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (11) TMI 1655

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d as the representation of the petitioner to the respondent No.2 for substitution of the property attached. (ii) The petitioner may within two weeks hereof make a further representation with documents to the respondent No.2. (iii) The respondent No.2 shall within three weeks hereof give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner to enable the petitioner to satisfy the respondent No.2 on all aspects in support of its representation. (iv) The petitioner shall render all further information and particulars as may be required by the respondent No.2 to be able to make the said decision. (v) The respondent No.2 shall pass a reasoned order on the representation aforesaid of the petitioner on or before 31st December, 2015. (vi) In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... elhi and the seat of the respondent No.1 would not confer jurisdiction. It is further contended that writ petitions arising out of the same order cannot be permitted to be filed in different High Courts, which may lead to multiplicity of decisions on the same issue; ii) that the petitioner has the remedy of approaching the Appellate Authority under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order of the Adjudicating Authority and once there is an alternative remedy, the ordinary rule is that petition under Article 226 would not be entertained. It is again contended that if one party prefers a writ petition and another party prefers the appeal, the possibility of conflicting decisions arises; attention is also dra .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion only for the reason that it did not have the jurisdiction. 5. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to dispose of this petition with the following directions: (i) This writ petition shall be treated as the representation of the petitioner to the respondent No.2 for substitution of the property attached. (ii) The petitioner may within two weeks hereof make a further representation with documents to the respondent No.2. (iii) The respondent No.2 shall within three weeks hereof give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner to enable the petitioner to satisfy the respondent No.2 on all aspects in support of its representation. (iv) The petitioner shall render all further information and particulars as may be required .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates