2017 (4) TMI 1082

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... br>Rajiv Shakdher And R. Suresh Kumar, JJ. For Appellant : Mr.Parthasarathy for M/s.Lakshmi Kumaran For Respondents : Mrs.R.Hemalatha JUDGMENT ( Judgment of the Court was delivered by Rajiv Shakdher, J. ) 1.These appeals have been filed under 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, whereby, challenge is laid to the final order dated 04.03.2010, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... till the period ending with, when duty once again upon receipt of additional consideration by the appellant. 4.Given these facts, the learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits, that this issue is covered against the appellant, by virtue of the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the matter of : Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune Vs. SKF India Limited, 2009 (239) E.L.T.385 (S.C.). .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6.1.However, having regard to the fact, that the said decision has been referred for reconsideration to a Larger Bench, we are inclined to dismiss the appeals, with the liberty to the appellant to revive the same, after giving due notice to the Department and its counsel, in the event, the decision rendered in Steel Authority of India Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur, is in favo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X