TMI Blog2016 (8) TMI 1194X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case of Kedar Constructions Vs. CC&CE, Kolhapur [2014 (11) TMI 336 - CESTAT MUMBAI], where it was held that Various activities undertaken by the appellant, though classifiable under Commercial or Industrial Construction prior to 01.06.2007 or under works contract service on or after 01.06.2007, would be eligible for the benefit of exemption - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - App ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the matter has come up for stay, with regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of the main appeal with the consent of both the sides. 2.Learned Advocate for the appellant Shri M. Narayanasamy Naidu points out that the matter has been set to rest in their favour in view of Boards subsequent Notification No.45/2010-ST dt. 20/07/2010 and a number of Tribunal decisions which ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|