9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 46X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cheque in question was issued by the third respondent/accused and hence, proceeding against the second accused cannot be entertained and hence as against the second accused/revision petitioner, the proceedings have to be quashed. - Crl. OP No.19982 of 2014, M.P.No.1 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 14-7-2017 - Teekaa Raman, J. For the Petitioner :Mr. T. Munirathinam Naidu For the Respondent :Mr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing the procedure, the complaint has been filed. 3. When the matter was taken up, the summons are issued. The second accused viz., Vidhya,W/o.V.Varadharaj, the proprietor of the first accused firm contended that the cheque (which is alleged to have dishonored) was issued by the third respondent, her husband in his individual capacity. Therefore, she is not liable to be prosecuted and hence, see ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eading to the filing of the above calender case. 6. The learned counsel for the respondent has stated that originally, the case was on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.VI,Coimbatore in C.C.No.2 of 2014 for the alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act for the dishonoured of cheque given by the third respondent before the trial Court. Subsequently, the case has been transf ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tition is allowed to the limited extent that proceedings in C.C.No.290 of 2014, Fast Track Court, Coimbatore which was now re-transferred as C.C.No.354 of 2015 as stated by the learned counsel for the respondent is quashed only to the extent of the second accused alone. Further, it is a specific case of the complainant that he has supplied material goods and for the liability of the respondents 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
