Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2011 (2) TMI 1524

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 530 of the Companies Act, 1956 ( the Companies Act ) to the extent of ₹ 48,091 has been admitted; however, claim regarding damages determined under section 14B for a sum of ₹ 18,395 was not admitted on the ground that the claim after passing of the winding up order is not admissible under the Companies Act. The brief resume of facts necessary for adjudication of the dispute are that M/s. Basera Cement Ltd. ( the company ) was ordered to be wound up vide order dated February 8, 2002, in Company Petition No. 38 of 2000 and the official liquidator attached to this court was appointed as provisional liquidator of the company to conduct proceedings of winding up with effect from the date of order (February 8, 2002) pursuant to whi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... barred; as such the application was filed under rule 177 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 and after the delay was condoned vide order dated February 27, 2009, in Company Application No. 9 of 2009, the claim was submitted by the appellant and was examined by the respondent (official liquidator). However, after taking note of the material placed on record, the dues towards the employer's contribution of the period which were prior to passing of the winding up order were admitted being preferential claim under section 530 of the Companies Act vide order dated May 12, 2009 (annexure 3) but at the same time, damages claimed by the appellant -authority vide order dated May 12, 2009 (annexure 4) were held inadmissible being claimed after .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s are also dues relating to the workmen; as such are required to be recovered under section 11(2) having overriding effect amongst preferential claim; in such circumstances, rejection of their claim for damages is not legally sustainable. Per contra, counsel for the respondent (official liquidator) submits that the EPF Act is a special Act of having introduced scheme of provident funds for the welfare of workers determined under section 7A; at the same time if an employer makes default in payment of contribution, damages can also be imposed after affording opportunity of hearing under section 14B of the EPF Act and as regards the employer's contribution, these dues are to be paid to the workmen concerned under section 530 of the Comp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ctober 11, 2001 (annexure 5) but recovery certificate was issued under section 8B of the EPF Act vide order dated April 24, 2002 (annexure 6), which was passed after passing of the winding up order dated February 8, 2002. ( 8. ) As regards the claim of the employer's contribution besides it being related to the period prior to the passing of winding up order, it was otherwise being preferential claim and admissible under section 530 of the Companies Act; as such was admitted by the respondent (official liquidator) vide order dated May 12, 2009 (annexure 3). However, the grievance raised herein is only in regard to the damages declined vide order dated May 12, 2009 (annexure 4). Apart from determination made in regard to the employ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates