Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (8) TMI 1223

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ommon order so far as it concerns all the seven matters that were decided by the CESTAT - there can be no doubt in the context of the right to appeal premised upon statutory provision, the mandate of the statute is to be followed. However, in the facts of the present case, the Court discerns no infirmity fatal or otherwise to say that the judgment finally disposing of the appeal in any manner prejudices the assessees/respondents, all of whom had notice and knowledge of the proceedings. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law, in concluding that duty demand against M/s. Modern Industrial Enterprises could not be confirmed since it was not possible to arrive a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) dated 18.07.2005. This Court had while entertaining the appeal formulated the following questions of law: - "1. Whether the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I had territorial jurisdiction to issue a show cause notice to M/s. Florida Electrical Industries Limited? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law, in concluding that duty demand against M/s. Modern Industrial Enterprises could not be confirmed since it was not possible to arrive at the value of clearances separately between M/s. Florida Electrical Industries Limited and M/s. Modern Industrial Enterprises?" 3. The applicant contends that it was not impleaded as a party in the main appeal an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e letter of Section 35G and the procedure prescribed for it in the CESTAT Rules applicable for such appeals necessitated the impleadment of each party and the preferring of a separate appeal in case of a common order on multiple appeals. In the present case, when the appeal was lodged in the first instance, only M/s Modern Industrial Enterprises was impleaded. Later, the Revenue sought to change the memo of parties - without any application to that effect. In the circumstances, it could not be said that a decision was rendered in properly instituted proceedings by way of an appeal resulting in a judgment adverse to M/s Florida Electrical Industries Ltd. or the other assessees/noticees. Learned counsel stressed that the impleadment applicati .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... missioner's findings, the adverse consequence of a penalty is likely to arise. It was submitted that the issue of penalty would arise in the case of the five individual assessees/parties and not merely the two corporate entities, i.e., M/s Modern Industrial Enterprises and M/s Florida Electrical Industries Ltd. As far as the facts go, regardless the rules that even though in the first instance when the appeal was filed only one party, i.e., M/s Modern Industrial Enterprises was impleaded nevertheless before the Court took the cognizance of the matter (which was on 06.02.2006), another memo of parties was filed on 02.02.2006. This listed the names of all the parties who were appellants before the CESTAT including M/s Florida Electrical Indu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o say that the judgment finally disposing of the appeal in any manner prejudices the assessees/respondents, all of whom had notice and knowledge of the proceedings. 7. So far as the second aspect urged with respect to the substantial question of law is concerned, the second question of law formulated by this Court clearly shows that the Court was aware and conscious of the fact that two entities, i.e., M/s Modern Industrial Enterprises and M/s Florida Electrical Industries Ltd. were involved. The Court's findings that the CESTAT should have analyzed the materials before it, which had been taken into account by the Commissioner in this regard in order to carry out the exercise of segregation, precisely addresses this issue. Here too, the C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates