9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 1140X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... njay Jain, ASG with Mr Sanjev Narula, CGSC with Mr Sunil Dalal, Ms Pallavi Shali, Advocates for UOI. Mr Deepak Sharma and Mr Ashish Sharma, Advocates O R D E R CM 17739/2014 and CM 17740/2014 For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. Both applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 7492/2014 Issue notice. The counsel for respondents accept notice. I have hear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oner; (c) Pass an appropriate Writ, Order or direction in the nature of a Writ directing the Respondent No.1 Department to pay the costs of the present proceedings to the Petitioner; The grievance of the petitioner is that although the amount has been refunded to the petitioner, he has not received interest on the demand drafts for a sum of Rs. 1.70 crores, which were seized by respondent No.1 o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dly, the respondents cannot profit from seizure of the amount in question. Mr Sanjay Jain, learned Additional Solicitor General who appears for respondent No.1 states that in the event any interest was earned and/or had accrued on the amount of Rs. 1.70 crores which was seized, the same would be paid to the petitioner. In view of the statement made by the learned Additional Solicitor General no f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
