2017 (9) TMI 1437

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , C.A. for the Appellant(s) Shri S.S. Chattopadhyay, Supdt.(AR) for the Revenue ORDER Per: Shri P.K. Choudhary In Appeal No.ST/52/07 Service Tax of Rs. 4,02,68,931/- stands confirmed along with interest and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalty of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 77 of the Act upon the Appellant M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Daltonganj w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tribunal for the first time and the same has also not been raised in the grounds of appeal as well. Further this claim was not raised before the original authority. On the other hand, liability to the extent of Rs. 3.05 Crores stands admitted before the Commissioner, during the course of adjudication in earlier appeal. 4. The ld. Advocate for the appellant submits a reconciliation statement and c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant requested for re-quantification of the demand as per reconciliation statement. In our considered view, the appellant should be given an opportunity to place the reconciliation statement in the interest of justice. The appellant also contended that the imposition of penalty is not warranted. 7. As the matter is remanded, the Adjudicating Authority should give a fresh look on the imposition of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X