TMI Blog2017 (10) TMI 155X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... A.R. for the Respondent-Revenue ORDER Per: Dr. D.M. Misra Heard both sides. This is an Application seeking rectification of the mistake in the order dated 06.2.2014 passed by this Tribunal. 3. This Tribunal after hearing both sides on the Rectification of Mistake application rejected their request vide order dated 23.6.2014. Aggrieved by the said rejection, the Appellant filed Special Civil A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tten submission after conclusion of hearing and from these documents the value of 16MM TMT bars could be arrived at. However, while passing the order, it were not taken into consideration, resulted into an error, glaring at para 4.1 of the Final Order of the Tribunal dated 6.2.2014. He submits that they have no objection in remanding the matter for verification of these documents inorder to ascert ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on, "Separate value of 16 MM, 20 MM, 25MM and 32 MM has not been made available, hence, separate duty cannot be assessed for 16 MM steel bars", it should be read as: - From the documents filed relating to the value of 16 mm "steel bars", the duty could be ascertained, accordingly, for the said purpose, the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority". 7. In Para 7, it should be read as: "Ap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|