9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 1304X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ners to deposit the entire tax as per the assessment orders and produce proof of such payment - Held that:- It will be appropriate for the first respondent to pass order on the petition for stay of demand as the same has been presented on 25.04.2016. In the meantime, if the petitioners are compelled to pay the tax as quantified in the order of assessment, the petition for stay of demand itself wou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... p, learned standing counsel accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, and with the consent of either side, the writ petitions itself are taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioners have filed these writ petitions challenging the notices dated 16.05.2017 issued by the third respondent under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. By way of impugned notices, the third respondent has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Thus, considering the facts of the case, it will be appropriate for the first respondent to pass order on the petition for stay of demand as the same has been presented on 25.04.2016. In the meantime, if the petitioners are compelled to pay the tax as quantified in the order of assessment, the petition for stay of demand itself would become infructuou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
