TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 1458X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e up for consideration in the respondent-assessee's husband's case. This Court refused to entertain the Revenue's appeal. No substantial question of law - Income Tax Appeal No. 1310 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 10-1-2017 - M. S. Sanklecha And A. K. Menon, JJ. For the Appellant : Ashok Kotangale a/w Padma Divakar For the Respondent : V. S. Hadade ORDER 1. This Appeal under Section 26 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sue on facts and law as arising herein came up for consideration in the respondent-assessee's husband's case. This Court refused to entertain the Revenue's appeal. 4. It is an agreed position between the parties that for the reasons stated in our order dated 5th January, 2017 in Shri Samson Perinchery (supra) the question as formulated in the present appeal does not give rise to any ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|