2017 (12) TMI 66

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ck. The AO was of the opinion that an addition of ₹ 8,67,87,925/- was justified on account of the discrepancy. The Appellate Commissioner was satisfied with the assessee’s explanation with respect to inflated statement of stock with the bankers and noted that no discrepancy in the stock statements as appearing from the physical verification and that apparent from the books of account emerged .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arch of those companies took place on 07.01.2010 for A.Y. 2010-11, was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act and substantial additions were made. 2. The assessee sole proprietor of M/s Deshraj Ashutosh involved in the business of sale and purchase of foodgrains on commission basis, was saddled with petitioner s liability on account of difference and discrepancy in the stock. The AO was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X