9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (2) TMI 1275X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the refund. Hence, no element of unjust enrichment. Time limitation - Held that: - the identical issue has came up before the Tribunal in the case of Chambal Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd. vs. CCE, Indore [2017 (1) TMI 549 - CESTAT NEW DELHI], where it was held that The applicability of Section 11B ibid for claiming refund of Central Excise duty/Service Tax is not restricted only to manufacture ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the appellant Shri Ranjan Khanna, AR for the Revenue JUDGEMENT Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal No. IND/CEX/000/APP/84/12 dated 23.03.2012 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Customs, Central Excise Service Tax, Indore. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant are engaged in the manufacture of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... thorised the appellant to receive the refund. Hence, no element of unjust enrichment. 4. From the record, it appears that the identical issue has came up before the Tribunal in the case of Chambal Fertilizers and Chemical Ltd. vs. CCE, Indore ST Appeal No. 1805/2012 dated 02.01.2017 where it was observed that: 9. In the present case, the transportation charges were determined by PNGRB in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ice tax is prima facie sustainable on legal grounds. Since the appellant is located in the jurisdiction of service tax authorities of Kota, before whom the refund application was filed on 17.01.2011, the required verification of documents may be carried out by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of Service tax, who is directed to examine the claim and dispose the same in view of the findings ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
