9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (12) TMI 457X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ainst the Order-in-Appeal No.236/2010 dated 31.12.2010. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 31.3.2009, at the Indira Gandhi International Airport, the export items by M/s Flame Branch were caught. The net weight was 1585 Kgs. and in the description it was mentioned as Hans khaini (the said goods/consignments). The same was kept in ready for onward loading in the air craft. On examination o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d. Counsel for the appellant submits that he is not raising any issue regarding the competency of the DRI. He made the request that the appeal may be decided on merit. 4. On merit, he submits that the appellant Shri Rajeev Banga was not the owner of M/s Gobind Tobacco Mfg. Co. but he was merely an employee. He submits that meeting was arranged at his instance between the CFA and the exporter but ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... introduced the exporter Mr. Rehmat with her. The meeting was held at his instance between the two. The statement of the appellant was recorded where he has accepted that he was fully aware about the Ketamine has been smuggled by concealing into the tobacco packet. 6. After hearing both the parties and by considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is crystal clear that it is a case of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
