2018 (1) TMI 51

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hah, Advocate And Mr Dhaval D Vyas, Advocate ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioners have challenged the communication/order dated 27.2.2017 issued by the Commission which reads as under : "Kindly refer to the Notice dated 15.02.2017 issued under Section 32 F (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and your reply dated 18.02.2017. In this context, I have been .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oceeded with. Issue notice as proposed. Call for Rev comments also." 3. This was conveyed to the petitioners by the impugned communication, at which stage, the petitioners approached this Court. 4. Even after issuing the said communication dated 27.2.2017, the Commission did not pass any further order of not allowing the proceedings to proceed further. Period of 14 days was over. Long aft .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X