9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (1) TMI 292X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Assessing Officer to the learned Special Government Pleader. 2.The petitioner had effected sales of scientific equipments to various educational institutions such as Indian Institute of Technology, etc., The petitioner's contention is that the supplies being effected to the educational institutions are capital goods and taxable under Schedule II Part B at the rate of 5% as per the amended Commodities list under CTD portal. The respondent rejected the petitioner's objection as not acceptable since the sales were made to Government will be treated as sales to unregistered dealer and the same is liable for tax at the rate of 14.5%. The stand taken in the impugned order has been reiterated by the Assessing Officer in the written inst ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der Section 8 (5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 C/D form is essential. The learned Judge, after considering the matter elaborately, set aside the circular, and at this stage, it would be beneficial to refer to the operative portion of the order, which reads as follows:- 9.The respondents have not disputed the fact that the petitioners are registered dealers of the above said goods to educational institutions and hospitals. In view of the admission of the learned Government Advocate, the petitioners cannot be denied of the benefits of concessional rate of tax, on the sales of the above said instruments and equipments in the course of inter-state trade or commerce, as contemplated by Notification No.II(1) CT & RE/38/76 dated 20.12.197 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... order, dated 31.03.2008 passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Thiruvanmiyur Assessment Circle, disallowing the concessional rate of tax at 5% on the sales to educational institutions (impugned in W.P.No.16154 of 2008) is set aside. 13.In the result, the Writ Petitions are allowed as indicated above. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 4. In the light of the above, the impugned order calls for interference, as the reasonings assigned by the respondent in the impugned order is incorrect. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remitted back to the respondent to take note of the decision rendered in the above referred case, and extend the concessio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
