9911796707
TMI Blog1974 (9) TMI 127X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nts/Defendant: Niren De, L.M. Singhvi and S.M. Jain and S. K. Tewari, Advs. JUDGMENT A.N. Ray, C.J. 1. These appeals are by special leave from the judgment dated 12 April, 1973 of the Rajasthan High Court. 2. The State of Rajasthan proposed to acquire land for the planned development of the city of Jaipur. 3. On 13 May, 1960 a notice was issued under Section 4 of the Rajasthan Land ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... otices dated 18 July, 1961 under Section 9 of the Act. 6. The High Court held that the appellants were guilty of inordinate delay. The appellants failed on that ground- 7. The High Court also dealt with the challenge to the land acquisition proceedings on the ground of discrimination and the further plea that the land was being acquired at negligible price and the same would be sold at exorb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ra) were these. On 13 November, 1959 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued. Between 1959 and 1961 objections were filed under Section 5A of the Act. On 18 March, 1966 declaration under Section 6 of the Act was published. In 1970 notices under Section 9 of the Act were issued. Writ Petitions were filed in 1972. The petitioners did not move after the declaration under S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
