1975 (9) TMI 190

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the learned single Judge, whereby he reviewed his earlier Order passed in revision and held that a personal decree should be passed, overruling the contention regarding limitation. 2. Shri Dikshit, appearing for the appellant, has strenuously pressed three points before us. He has contended that the whole decree was a nullity, because the minor against whom the suit was filed had not been re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... his submission. On the other hand, Counsel for the respondent, Shri Goyal has drawn our attention to the Judgment of the original Court wherein it is stated It is not disputed that the decree out of which these proceedings have arisen had provided that if the sale proceeds of the mortgaged property were insufficient to satisfy the decree, it was open to the decree-holder to recover the balance fr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eriod of three years only, even if Section 19 may give an extension of limitation. We see no merit in this contention. The function of Section 19 is to provide a later date to count the period of limitation afresh, and that fresh period of limitation will be computed from the time when the acknowledgement is signed. Nothing turns on whether the acknowledgement is itself registered or not The offic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X