2011 (6) TMI 949

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ORDER Learned HCGP is directed to take notice for the respondent. 2. Feeling aggrieved by the orders of re-assessment at Annexure 'A' for the tax period from April, 2006 to March, 2007 and the consequential demand notices at Annexures 'B' and 'C', the petitioner has filed different appeals before the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals)-3, Bangalore. In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d of deemed vacation of stay. 3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has deposited 50% of the disputed taxes at the time of filing of the appeals. It is the case of the petitioner that it is not responsible for delay in disposal of the appeals. It is submitted that petitioner has a good case on merits and if the assessing authority recovers that balance of the taxes, it will be put to gre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X