TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 1544X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ? Held that: - the issue has been settled by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in appellant's own case reported as CEAT Ltd. [2015 (2) TMI 794 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT], where it was held that interest is not chargeable on the differential duty paid before finalization of assessment - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2012-13. 3. Shri Rajesh Ostwal. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the very same issue has been decided in the appellant's own case by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court reported as CEAT Limited Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. & Cus. Nashik 2015 (317) E.L.T. 192 (Born.). This judgment was challenged by the Revenue before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CC NO. 20219/2015 wherei ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|