9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 716X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... instruments, participation in conferences involving legal discussion. If not, whether there is a bar for the said law firms or lawyers to visit India on ‘fly in and fly out’ basis for giving legal advice regarding foreign law on diverse international legal issues? - Held that: - Visit of any foreign lawyer on fly in and fly out basis may amount to practice of law if it is on regular basis. A casual visit for giving advice may not be covered by the expression ‘practice’ - If prohibition applies to an individual, it equally applies to group of individuals or juridical persons. Whether there is no bar to foreign law firms and lawyers from conducting arbitration proceedings and disputes arising out of contracts relating to international commercial arbitration? - Held that: - It is not possible to hold that there is absolutely no bar to a foreign lawyer for conducting arbitrations in India. If the matter is governed by particular rules of an institution or if the matter otherwise falls under Section 32 or 33, there is no bar to conduct such proceedings in prescribed manner. If the matter is governed by an international commercial arbitration agreement, conduct of proceedings may ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... v, Adv., Mr. M. C. Dhingra, AOR, Mr. Sajan Poovya, Sr. Adv., Mr. Robin R. David, Adv., Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Adv., Mr. Ritin Rai, Adv., Ms. Sonali Khanna, Adv., for M/S. Dua Associates, AOR, Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv., Mr. Priyadarshi Banerjee, Adv., Mr. Pratibhanu Kharola, Adv., Mr. Ritin Rain, Adv., Mr. Aabhaas Kshetrapal, Adv., Mr. Chitranshvl Sinha, Adv., Gohil, Adv., Ms. Abhishek Mallick, Adv., Mr. Zain Maqbool, Adv., Mr. C. Mukund, Adv., Mr. Pankaj Jain, Adv., Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv., Mohd. Faris, Adv., Ms. Geet9ika Mitta, Adv., Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, AOR, Mr. Lait Bhasin, Adv., Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv., Ms. Anindita Pujari, AOR, Ms. Yashish, Adv, Ms. Kavita Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Swaroop, Adv., Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv., Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv., Mr. Himanshu, Adv., Mr. Dr. Lalit Bhasin, Adv., Ms. Nina Gupta, Adv., Mr. Mudit Sharma, AOR, Mrs. Shally Bhasin, AOR, Mr. Ritin Rai, Adv., Mr. Subhro Sanyal, AOR, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR, Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR, Mr. Vikas Singh Jangra, AOR, Mr. N. L. Ganapathi, AOR, Mr. Jafar Alam, Adv., Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv., M/S. Lex-peritia Co., AOR, Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR, Ms. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t, on the other hand, concluded as follows: 60. For all the aforesaid reasons, we hold that in the facts of the present case, the RBI was not justified in granting permission to the foreign law firms to open liaison offices in India under Section 29 of the 1973 Act. We further hold that the expressions ' to practise the profession of law' in Section 29 of the 1961 Act is wide enough to cover the persons practising in litigious matters as well as persons practising in non litigious matters and, therefore, to practise in non litigious matters in India, the respondent Nos. 12 to 14 were bound to follow the provisions contained in the 1961 Act. The petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. 4. When the matter against the judgment of the Madras High Court came up for hearing before this Court on 4th July, 2012, following interim order was passed : In the meanwhile, it is clarified that Reserve Bank of India shall not grant any permission to the foreign law firms to open liaison offices in India under Section 29 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. It is also clarified that the expression to practice the profession of law under Se ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der the Act. In India, the legal profession is considered as a noble profession to serve the society and not treated as a business but the foreign law firms treat the profession as trade and business venture to earn money. Indian lawyers are prohibited from advertising, canvassing and solicit work but foreign law firms are advertising through websites and canvass and solicit work by assuring results. Many accountancy and management firms are also employing graduates and thus rendering legal services. 8. The stand of the Union of India initially was that if foreign law firms are not allowed to take part in negotiations, settling of documents and arbitrations in India, it will obstruct the aim of making India a hub of international arbitration. Many arbitrations with Indian Judges as arbitrators and Indian lawyers are held outside India where foreign and Indian law firms advise their clients. Barring the entry of foreign law firms for arbitrations in India will result in many arbitrations shifting to Singapore, Paris and London, contrary to the declared policy of the Government and against national interest. However, its final stand in affidavits dated 19th April, 2011 and 17th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd of the Union of India is that presently it is waiting for the Bar Council of India to frame rules on the subject. However, it can frame rules under Section 49A at any stage. 10. Stand of the Bar Council of India before the High Court is that even non litigious practice is included in the practice of law which can be done only by advocates enrolled under the Act. Reliance was placed on the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Lawyers Collective (supra). Further reference was made to Sections 24 and 29 of the Act. Section 47(2) read with Section 49(1)(e) provides for recognition of qualifications of foreigners being recognized for practice. It was submitted that practice of foreign lawyers in India should be subject to regulatory powers of the Bar Council. 11. Stand of the foreign law firms, inter alia, is that there is no bar to a company carrying on consultancy/support services in the field of protection and management of intellectual, business and industrial proprietary rights, carrying out market service and market research, publication of reports, journals etc. A person not appearing before Courts or Tribunals and not giving legal advice cannot be said to be practi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondent Nos.19, 26, 39 and 40 stated that they are limited law partnerships under Laws of England. They do not have any law office in India. Respondents Nos.20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 38 also stated that they do not have any office in India and do not practice Indian law. Indian lawyers cannot advice on foreign laws and the requirement of Indian litigants in regard is met by foreign lawyers. Its lawyers fly in and fly out of India on need basis to advise the clients on international transactions. To the extent Indian law is involved such matters are addressed by Indian lawyers. 13. The respondent No.22 stated that it is an international law firm but does not have any office in India. It advises clients on laws other than Indian laws. Its India Practice Group advises clients on commercial matters involving an Indian Element relating to mergers, acquisitions, capital markets, projects, energy and infrastructure, etc. from an international legal perspective and it does not amount to practice in Indian law. Respondent No.23 stated that it is only advising on matters of English, European Union and Hong Kong laws. It has working relationships with leading l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB for short) a High Powered body established under the New Industrial Policy seeking their approval in the matter. The FIPB had rejected the proposal submitted by the foreign law firms. Thereafter, these law firms sought approval from RBI and RBI granted the approval in spite of the rejection of FIPB. Though specific grievance to that effect is made in the petition, the RBI has chosen not to deal with those grievances in its affidavit in reply. Thus, in the present case, apparently, the stand taken by RBI FIPB are mutually contradictory. 45. In any event, the fundamental question to be considered herein is, whether the foreign law firms namely respondent Nos. 12 to 14 by opening liaison offices in India could carry on the practise in non litigious matters without being enrolled as Advocates under the 1961 Act ? 46. Before dealing with the rival contentions on the above question, we may quote Sections 29, 30, 33 and 35 of the 1961 Act, which read thus: 29. Advocates to be the only recognised class of persons entitled to practice law. - Subject to the provisions of this Act and any rules made there under, there ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion (3), he shall, during the period of suspension, be debarred from practising in any Court or before any authority or person in India. (5) Where any notice is issued to the Advocate-General under Subsection (2), the Advocate-General may appear before the disciplinary committee of the State Bar Council either in person or through any advocate appearing on his behalf. Explanation-In this section, (Section 37 and Section 38), the expressions Advocate- General and Advocate-General of the State shall, in relation to the Union territory of Delhi, mean the Additional Solicitor General of India. 47 . The argument of the foreign law firms is that Section 29 of the 1961 Act is declaratory in nature and the said section merely specifies the persons who are entitled to practise the profession of law. According to the respondent Nos. 12 to 14, the expression 'entitled to practise the profession of law' in Section 29 of the 1961 Act does not specify the field in which the profession of law could be practised. It is Section 33 of the 1961 Act which provides that advocates alone are entitled to practise in any Court or before any authority or person. Ther ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of appearing before the Courts. He may be interested in practising only in non litigious matters. Therefore, the bar under Section 33 from appearing in any Court (except when permitted by Court under Section 32 of the 1961 Act or any other Act) unless enrolled as an advocate does not bar a person from being enrolled as an advocate under Section 29 of the 1961 Act for practising the profession of law in non litigious matters. The Apex Court in the case of Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal (supra) has held that the right to practise is the genus of which the right to appear and conduct cases in the Court may be a specie. Therefore, the fact that Section 33 of the 1961 Act provides that advocates alone are entitled to practice before any Court / authority it cannot be inferred that the 1961 Act applies only to persons practising in litigious matters and would not apply to person practising in non litigious matters. 51. It was contended that the 1961 Act does not contain any penal provisions for breaches committed by a person practicing in nonlitigious matter and, therefore, the 1961 Act cannot apply to persons practising in nonlitigious matters. There is no merit in this contention, becaus ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not legislate under that entry in respect of advocates practising before the District Courts/ Magistrate's Courts / other Courts / Tribunals / authorities and consequently, the 1961 Act to the extent it applies to advocates practising in Courts other than the High Courts and Supreme Court would be ultra vires the Constitution. Such a narrow construction is unwarranted because, once the Parliament invokes its power to legislate on advocates practising the profession of law, then the entire field relating to advocates would be open to the Parliament to legislate and accordingly the 1961 Act has been enacted to cover the entire field. In any event, the question as to whether the persons practicing the profession of law exclusively in nonlitigious matters are covered under the 1961 Act, or not was not an issue directly or indirectly considered by the Apex Court in the case of O.N. Mohindroo (supra). Therefore, the decision of the Apex Court in the above case does not support the case of the contesting respondents. ... .. 55. It was contended by the counsel for Union of India that if it is held that the 1961 Act applies to persons practising in non-litigious mat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... respondents that the 1961 Act is restricted to the persons practising the profession of law in litigious matters is accepted, then an advocate found guilty of misconduct in performing his duties while practising in non-litigious matters cannot be punished under the 1961 Act. Similarly, where an advocate who is debarred for professional misconduct can merrily carry on the practise in nonlitigious matters on the ground that the 1961 Act is not applicable to the persons practising the profession of law in non litigious matters. Such an argument which defeats the object of the 1961 Act cannot be accepted. 58. It may be noted that Rule 6(1) in Chapter III Part VI of the Bar Council of India Rules framed under Section 49(1) (ah) of the 1961 Act provides that an advocate whose name has been removed by an order of the Supreme Court or a High Court or the Bar Council as the case may be, shall not be entitled to practise the profession of law either before the Court and authorities mentioned under Section 30 of the 1961 Act, or in chambers, or otherwise. The above rule clearly shows that the chamber practise, namely, practise in non litigious matters is also within the purview ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rt is as to whether a foreign law firm, without establishing any liaison office in India visiting India for the purpose of offering legal advice to their clients in India on foreign law, is prohibited under the provisions of the Advocates Act. In other words, the question here is, whether a foreign lawyer visiting India for a temporary period to advise his client on foreign law can be barred under the provisions of the Advocates Act. This issue was neither raised nor answered by the Bombay High Court in the aforesaid judgment. 19. It was held : 51. We find force in the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the foreign law firms that if foreign law firms are not allowed to take part in negotiations, for settling up documents and conduct arbitrations in India, it will have a counter productive effect on the aim of the Government to make India a hub of International Arbitration. According to the learned counsel, many arbitrations with Indian Judges and Lawyers as Arbitrators are held outside India, where both foreign and Indian law firms advise their clients. If foreign law firms are denied entry to deal with arbitrations in India, then India wil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the law in force in India and where at least one of the parties is (i) an individual who is a national of, or habitually resident in, any country other than India; or (ii) a body corporate which is incorporated in any country other than India; or (iii) a company or an association or a body of individuals whose central management and control is exercised in any country other than India; or (iv) the Government of a foreign country. 54 . From the above definition, it is manifestly clear that any arbitration matter between the parties to the arbitration agreement shall be called an international commercial arbitration if the matter relates to the disputes, which may or may not be contractual, but where at least one of the parties habitually resides abroad whether a national of that country or not. The New York Convention will apply to an arbitration agreement if it has a foreign element or flavour involving international trade and commerce, even though such an agreement does not lead to a foreign award. 55 . International arbitration is growing big time in India and in almost all the countries across the globe. India is a signatory to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot be denied that disputes and differences are bound to arise in such International contracts. When one of the contracting party is a foreign entity and there is a binding arbitration agreement between the parties and India is chosen as the seat of arbitration, it is but natural that the foreign contracting party would seek the assistance of their own solicitors or lawyers to advice them on the impact of the laws of their country on the said contract, and they may accompany their clients to visit India for the purpose of the Arbitration. Therefore, if a party to an International Commercial Arbitration engages a foreign lawyer and if such lawyers come to India to advice their clients on the foreign law, we see there could be no prohibition for such foreign lawyers to advise their clients on foreign law in India in the course of a International Commercial transaction or an International Commercial Arbitration or matters akin thereto. Therefore, to advocate a proposition that foreign lawyers or foreign law firms cannot come into India to advice their clients on foreign law would be a far fetched and dangerous proposition and in our opinion, would be to take a step backward, when India ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tered the names and addresses of (a) all persons who were entered as an Advocate on the roll of any High Court under the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926, immediately before the appointed date and (b) all other persons admitted to be Advocates on the roll of the State Bar Council under the Act on or after the appointed date. In terms of Section 24(1) of the Act, subject to the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder, a person shall be qualified to be admitted as an advocate on a state roll if he fulfils the conditions (a) a citizen of India, (b) has completed 21 years of age and (c) obtained a degree in Law. The proviso to Section 24(1)(a) states that subject to the other provisions of the Act, a National of any other country may be admitted as an Advocate on a State roll, if a citizen of India, duly qualified is permitted to practice law in that other country. In terms of Section 47(1) of the Act, where any country specified by the Central Government by notification prevents citizens of India practicing the profession of Law or subjects them to unfair discrimination in that country, no subject of any such country shall be entitled to practice the profession of Law in India ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t remains that foreign laws are not taught at graduate level in Indian Law schools, except Comparative Law Degree Courses at the Master's level. 61 . As noticed above, the Government of India, in their counter affidavit dated 19.08.2010, have stated that the contention raised by the petitioner that foreign law firms should not be allowed to take part in negotiating settlements, settling up documents and arbitrations will be counter productive, as International Arbitration will be confined to a single country. It is further pointed out that many arbitrations are held outside India with Indian Judges and Lawyers as Arbitrators where both foreign and Indian Law firms advise their clients. It has been further stated if foreign law firms are denied permission to deal with arbitration in India, then we would lose many arbitrations to other countries and this is contrary to the declared policy of the Government and will be against the National interest, especially when the Government wants India to be a hub of International Arbitration 62 . At this juncture, it is necessary to note yet another submission made by the Government of India in their counter. It has been s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ons as advocates, safeguarding rights, privileges and interests of advocates. Section 17 lays down that every State Bar Council shall prepare a roll of advocates and no person can be enrolled in more than one State Bar Council. Section 24 lays down qualifications for admission on the roll of a State Bar council. The qualifications include the citizenship of India, unless a person is national of a country where citizens of India are permitted to practice. One is required to have the prescribed qualification from India or out of India if such degree is recognized by the Bar Council of India, being a Barrister called to the Bar before 31st December, 1976, passing of articled clerks examination or any other examination specified by the Bombay or Calcutta High Court or obtaining foreign qualification recognized by the Bar Council of India are also the prescribed qualifications. It was submitted that even in other jurisdictions, persons other than those enrolled with the concerned Bar Council are not allowed to practice. Even short term running of legal service is subject to regulatory regime. 21. Learned counsel for the foreign law firms S/Shri Arvind Datar, Sajjan Poovayya, Dushy ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rence between the right of a Mexican lawyer to act and advise the public in divorce matters and the right (3 N.Y.2d 232) of foreign lawyers generally to act an advise with respect to foreign law. The complex problem posed by the activities of foreign attorneys here is a long-standing one. It may well be that foreign attorneys should be licensed to deal with clients in matters exclusively concerning foreign law, but that is solely within the province of the Legislature. Our courts are given much control over the lawyers admitted to the Bar of our State; we have no control, however, over those professing to be foreign law experts. We see no substance in appellant s claim that section 270 of the Penal Law when applied to him deprives him of liberty and property without due process of law, in that the statute as so construed is unreasonable and serves no public purpose. 23. The minority view, on the other hand, held that: In this century when the United States has become the creditor nation of the world and when the ramifications of our industrial, commercial, financial and recreational lives extend to every corner of the global, it is especially impr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onal treatment warranting the ignoring of state lines. This is such a situation. Under the peculiar facts here present, having in mind the nature of the services to be rendered, the inseparability of the New York and New Jersey transactions, and the substantial nature of the New York claim, we conclude that plaintiff s agreement to furnish services in New Jersey was not illegal and contrary to public policy. It must be remembered that we are not here concerned with any participated by plaintiff in a court proceeding. What is involved is the rendering of advice and assistance in obtaining extensions of credit and compromises of indebtedness. 25. Again, there was a dissenting view as follows: Regulation of the interests of the public and the bar requires a rule of general application. In cases such as we have here, the only fair and workable rule is one which recognizes that the client s matter is primarily a New Jersey one and calls for the engagement of a member of our bar for the legal services to be rendered here. And, in that connection, in the interest of interstate amity, if an out-ofstate attorney renders legal services in New Jersey which are a minor or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the parties. Article-V(1)(b) provides that if the party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice or could not present his case, the award cannot be enforced. Section 53 of the Arbitration Act refers to Geneva Convention Awards which is regulated by the Second Schedule to the Act containing similar provisions. 29. Mr. Dave submitted that the Special Leave Petition arising out of the Delhi High Court order is on the question whether London Court of International Arbitration could use the expression COURT had become infructuous as the respondent had closed its working in India. He, however, referred the following: I) Handbook of ICC Arbitration Commentary, Precedents, Materials Second Edition (Michael W. Buhler and Thomas H. Webster) Article 21(4): The parties may appear in person or through duly authorized representatives. In addition, they may be assisted by advisers. The authors comment is as follows: In an ICC arbitration, parties have the right to be represented by the persons of their choice. A distinction should however be made between authorized representatives and advisors . Usually, the parties have attorneys r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... representation (The arbitration rules of the Australian Football league, for example, limit legal representation.) In international commercial arbitrations it is generally accepted that the parties may choose their own advocate without necessarily choosing one qualified at the seat of the arbitration (See, for example, In the matter of an Arbitration between Lawler, Matusky and Skelly, Engineers and the Attorney General of Barbados (No.320 of 1981) 22 August 1983 where the High Court of Barbados held that there was a common law right of everyone who is sui juris to appoint an agent for any purpose . The court held that this included the right to appoint a representative to appear as advocate on a party s behalf in a commercial arbitration.) . However, in a few recent cases that principle has been challenged (In the matter of an Arbitration between Builders Federal (Hong Kong) Ltd. and Joseph Gartner Co., and Turner (East Asia) Pte Ltd (No. 90 of 1987) (1988) 2 MLJ 280 the Malaysian Judicial Commissioner Chan Sek Keong ruled that the respondents, who were a foreign company, could not select a counsel from their own country because Singapore s Legal Profession Act operated as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... si-judicial proceeding.) A party to an arbitration may, in theory, be represented by his plumber, his dentist, or anyone else of his choosing, although the choice usually falls on a lawyer or specialist claims consultant in the relevant industry (English Arbitration Act, 1996, s 36. This reaffirms the previous common law position.) IV) LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) RULES (2014) Article 18 Legal Representatives 18.1Any party may be represented in the arbitration by one or more authorized legal representatives appearing by name before the Arbitral Tribunal. 18.2 Until the Arbitral Tribunal s formation, the Registrar may request from any party: (i) written proof of the authority granted by that party to any legal representative designated in its Request or Response; and (ii) written confirmation of the names and addresses of all such party s legal representatives in the arbitration. After its formation, at any time, the arbitral Tribunal may order any party to provide similar proof or confirmation in any form considers appropriate. V) CHINA INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND TRADE ARBITRATION COMMISSIN (CIETAC) ARBITRATION RULES. Ar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a. The argument that participation of foreign lawyers will be in the interest of the country was raised by the foreign law firms only as shown from para 51 of the Madras High Court judgment. He submitted that the arbitrator was also an authority before whom only advocates enrolled in India alone could appear. The arbitrator could record evidence and summon witnesses through Court(Section 27). Rules of Arbitration Institutions have to be in conformity with the law of the land. He also submitted that the rules framed by the Bar Council of India under Section 49 define the practice of law so as to cover even giving of opinion. 31. Shri Singh further pointed out that Ethics for the profession as applicable in India are different from the Ethics applicable in other countries. In this regard, it was submitted that Rule 36 in Part VI, Chapter II of the BCI Rules prohibits direct or indirect advertising by advocates, or solicitation by any means whatsoever. Rule 18 bars an advocate from fomenting litigation. In Bar Council of Maharashtra versus M.V. Dabholkar (1976) 2 SCC 291 , this Court held that advertising was a serious professional misconduct for an advocate. As against t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in court unassisted by an advocate (Part VI, Chapter I of the Bar Council of India Rules). In U.S.A., no such distinction or designations are made. In U.K., there appear to be no restrictions on Queen s Counsel (QCs) similar to the ones imposed by the Bar Council in India. QCs are permitted to join law firms as partners. 35. In India, funding of litigation by advocates is not explicitly prohibited, but a conjoint reading of Rule 18 (fomenting litigation), Rule 20 (contingency fees), Rule 21 (share or interest in an actionable claim) and Rule 22 (participating in bids in execution, etc.) would strongly suggest that advocates in India cannot fund litigation on behalf of their clients. There appears to be no restriction on third parties (non-lawyers) funding the litigation and getting repaid after the outcome of the litigation. In U.S.A., lawyers are permitted to fund the entire litigation and take their fee as a percentage of the proceeds if they win the case. Third Party Litigation Funding/Legal Financing agreements are not prohibited. In U.K., Section 58B of the Courts and Legal Services Act, 1990 permits litigation funding agreements between legal service providers and liti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o such Ethics is integral to the administration of justice. The professional standards laid down from time to time are required to be followed. Thus, we uphold the view that practice of law includes litigation as well as non litigation. RE : (ii) 40. We have already held that practicing of law includes not only appearance in courts but also giving of opinion, drafting of instruments, participation in conferences involving legal discussion. These are parts of non-litigation practice which is part of practice of law. Scheme in Chapter-IV of the Advocates Act makes it clear that advocates enrolled with the Bar Council alone are entitled to practice law, except as otherwise provided in any other law. All others can appear only with the permission of the court, authority or person before whom the proceedings are pending. Regulatory mechanism for conduct of advocates applies to non-litigation work also. The prohibition applicable to any person in India, other than advocate enrolled under the Advocates Act, certainly applies to any foreigner also. RE : (iii) 41. Visit of any foreign lawyer on fly in and fly out basis may amount to practice of law if it is on regular basis. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ofession of law in India either in the litigation or in nonlitigation side. We, however, modify the direction of the Madras High Court in Para 63(ii) that there was no bar for the foreign law firms or foreign lawyers to visit India for a temporary period on a fly in and fly out basis for the purpose of giving legal advice to their clients in India regarding foreign law or their own system of law and on diverse international legal issues. We hold that the expression fly in and fly out will only cover a casual visit not amounting to practice . In case of a dispute whether a foreign lawyer was limiting himself to fly in and fly out on casual basis for the purpose of giving legal advice to their clients in India regarding foreign law or their own system of law and on diverse international legal issues or whether in substance he was doing practice which is prohibited can be determined by the Bar Council of India. However, the Bar Council of India or Union of India will be at liberty to make appropriate Rules in this regard including extending Code of Ethics being applicable even to such cases. 45. We also modify the direction in Para 63 (iii) that foreign lawyers cannot be deb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
