9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1382X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... T ( Judgment of this Court was made by S. Manikumar, J. ) Being aggrieved by the Final Order No.357 of 2010, dated 24.03.2010, on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed on the following substantial questions of law:- "(i) Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT, Chennai was correct in passing its Final Order N ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Notice taken by the appellant has been returned in the year 2010, with postal endorsement "No such Company in the address. Returned to the sender". 3. As per the registry's note, second batta with petition is due on service to the sole respondent. More than 7 years have lapsed, since the return of notice. 4. Perusal of the material on record, discloses that the lis is for refund ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ding monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department before CESTAT - regarding. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 131 BA of the Customs Act, 1962 and in partial modification of earlier instruction issued from F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17.12.2015, Centra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
