9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1382X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... amount involved, is less that the aforesaid limit, the appeal is dismissed. - C.M.A. No. 3114 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 5-3-2018 - S. Manikumar And T. Ravindran, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr.Rajasekar for Junior Standing Counsel (C CE) For the Respondent : No Appearance JUDGMENT ( Judgment of this Court was made by S. Manikumar, J. ) Being aggrieved by the Final Order No.357 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Hon'ble Tribunal was correct in ignoring the question of unjust enrichment raised in the order passed by the Original Adjudicating Authority ignoring the provisions of Section 11 B? 2. Record of proceedings shows that appeal has been admitted and notice has been ordered on 18.11.2010. Notice taken by the appellant has been returned in the year 2010, with postal endorsement No such Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Chief Commissioner (AR), All Commissioners (AR),Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. 3. All Principal Commissioners / Commissioners of Customs / Central Excise / Service Tax / Commissioner, Directorate of Legal Affairs. 4. [email protected] Sir/Madam, Sub: - Reduction of Government litigation - providing monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department befor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
