1935 (4) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the First Class Subordinate Judge of Dhulia, and it raises a very short point. The plaintiffs, who are a limited company, sued to recover a sum of ₹ 5,187-15-0 as a refund of the amount charged upon them by the defendant Dhulia Municipality for terminal tax. The Judge held that the plaintiffs were not liable to tax, but as to a large part of the claim it was held that that was barred by l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd not for sale, provided the quantity of such goods is reasonable, having regard to the status and circumstances of the owner thereof. The goods which were imported within the limits of the defendant Municipality in this case were building materials which the plaintiffs required to use for the purposes of building their own mill and not for the purposes of sale, and therefore they claimed to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X