2017 (8) TMI 1365

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Bhopal Versus M/s. S.S. Cropcare Ltd. [2016 (7) TMI 1140 - CESTAT NEW DELHI], where it was held that The technical objection raised by the Revenue seems to be only one that Bill of entry was endorsed by the importer in favor of the assessee by the principal manufacturer and such endorsement cannot be accepted - credit allowed - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - E/1208/2010-SM - Fi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the said supplier in respect of the Bill of Entry No.641594 dt. 11/07/2008 on which the goods were consigned. During the verification of the records, Revenue issued a show-cause notice alleging that the appellant has wrongly availed CENVAT credit on endorsed Bill of Entry consigned to M/s. Sanofi Synthelabo (India) Ltd.. After following the due process of law, the Commissioner confirmed the de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... td. [2016(343) ELT 1087 (Tri. Del.)] ii. UOI Vs. Marmagoa Steel Ltd. [2008(229) ELT 481 (SC)] iii. Order-in-Appeal No.17/2012 dt. 31/01/2012. iv. Twenty First Century Printers Ltd. Vs. CCE, Surat-II [2009(234) ELT 277 (Tri. Ahmd.)] v. Vimal Enterprises Vs. UOI [2006(195) ELT 267 (Guj.)] vi. Bando India (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Delhi-III [2010(262) ELT 1103 (Tri. Del.)] 5. On .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X