9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1113X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Per Anil G. Shakkarwar: 1. The present appeal filed by the Revenue and is directed against order-in-Appeal No. 214/BK/GGN/2012 dated 30.05.2012 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) Customs Central Excise, Delhi-III, at Gurgaon. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent imported and filed bill of entries during the period from 11.02.2002 to 15.09.2003 and declared the goods as natural ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rt dated 17.12.2003 issued by CRCL and held that the goods imported were natural rubber and confirmed the demand and imposed equal penalty and held that the goods could not be confiscated since they were not available. Aggrieved by the said order, the respondent preferred appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). The Id. Commissioner (Appeals) decided the appeal through the impugned order-in-appeal wh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent. 5. Having considered rival contentions and on perusal of record, we do not find any ground raised by Revenue to argue as to how the finding of Id. Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order-in-appeal is not sustainable. We therefore do not find any merit in the appeal filed by Revenue. We therefore dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue. The cross objection is also disposed off, The respo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
