9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1195X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... C/ROA/41534, 41535/2017 in C/369, 370/2009 - 2-3/2018 - Dated:- 8-2-2018 - Ms. Sulekha Beevi C-S Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) Shri N. Anand, Advocate for the Appellant Shri Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR) for the Respondent. Per: Sulekha Beevi C.S. The above ROA applications are filed by the appellant seeking to restore the appeals which wer ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... He submitted that the appellants have been given enough chances for hearing and therefore the applications deserve to be dismissed. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The case was earlier posted for hearing on 22.08.2017. It is their case that on such date they had requested for adjournment. On going through the ROA application, we find that the appellant has produced a copy of a letter requesting for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... en after granting adjournment on 22.08.2017 nor filed any request for adjournment, we deem it fit to impose conditions. The ROA will stand allowed on the condition that the appellant pays cost of ₹ 15,000/- to the Revenue within a period of one month and report compliance. On failure of compliance, the ROA will stand dismissed. It is also directed that the appellant shall not be given any fu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
