2017 (10) TMI 1308

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... st round of litigation - Appeal to the extent of the excess penalty imposed, more than the duty confirmed, is set-aside - appeal allowed in part. - Appeal No : E/568/2008 - ORDER No. A/13079 / 2017 - Dated:- 5-10-2017 - Mr. M. V. Ravindran, Hon'ble Member (Judicial) For the Appellant : Shri Amal Dave, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri J. Nagori, AR JUDGEMENT Per : Mr. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... also directed that penalty should be imposed on the basis of requantification of the demand. 5. Ld. Counsel submits that the re-quantified duty is ₹ 22,09,779/-, while the adjudicating authority has imposed a penalty of ₹ 25 lakhs, which is not correct, even by the provision of Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 6. Ld. Departmental Representative submits that the pen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X