9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (5) TMI 811X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... The Respondent : Sri. C. K. Govindan JUDGMENT The petitioner impugns the action for recovery initiated by the competent authorities, subsequent to orders of assessment made against him for the year 2016-17, copies of which have been appended to this writ petition as Exts. P1, P1 (a), P1 (b) and P1 (c). According to the petitioner, against the orders of assessment and penalty, he has preferred ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s that since the amount involved is substantial, no order of stay may be granted, except on terms. 3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader. 4. Taking note of similar orders passed by this Court in analoguous situations, I am of the view that the petitioner can be given some respite from the rigor of recovery, a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cates the same to the petitioner, all steps for recovery pursuant to various demand notices for recovery of amounts against the petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance. 6. To facilitate an expeditious disposal of the applications and appeals, I direct the petitioner to place a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition, before the 2nd respondent, and the time-frame gra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
