Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (2) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Income-tax Appellate Tribunal made in IT(SS)A No. 211/Mds/ 2003, dated January 6, 2004. The facts in brief are: There was a search conducted by the Revenue officials under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in the residence as well as in the business premises of the assessee on November 23, 2000, and it was concluded on March 14, 2001, and a block assessment was framed for the block period .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e following substantial question of law: "Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that surcharge is not applicable to block assessments if the search took place prior to introduction of the proviso to section 113 with effect from June 1, 2002?" Heard both sides. With regard to the issue raised, viz., whether surcharge could be levied for the block .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... provisions of section 113 of the Act are as under: '113. Tax in the case of block assessment of search cases.- The total undisclosed income of the block period, determined under section 158BC, shall be chargeable to tax at the rate of sixty per cent.: Provided that the tax chargeable under this section shall be increased by a surcharge, if any, levied by any Central Act and applicable in the as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iated under section 132 or requisition was made under section 132A. This amendment will take effect from June 1, 2002. We have perused section 113 of the Act, especially the proviso added on June 1, 2002, which provides for levy of surcharge. Counsel could not dispute that the same has not been given retrospective effect on the language of clause 41 of the Notes on Clauses is in clear terms. Si .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as commenced on November 23, 2000, and concluded on March 14, 2001, which is obviously prior to the introduction of the proviso to section 113. Accordingly, finding no illegality in the order of the Tribunal, we answer the question of law referred to above, in the affirmative, against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. The appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgem .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates