9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Whether surcharge is applicable to block assessments if the search took place before the introduction of the proviso to section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961? Analysis: The judgment delivered by the High Court of Madras pertains to a tax case appeal challenging the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The case involved a search conducted by Revenue officials under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, resulting in a block assessment for the period April 1, 1990, to November 22, 2000. The dispute centered around the levy of a surcharge at 17% on the tax payable on the block assessment. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the surcharge, but the Tribunal ruled that the surcharge proviso introduced in section 113 was applicable only to searches conducted after June 1, 2002. The central issue was whether surcharge could be imposed on block assessments if the search occurred before the proviso's introduction. The High Court referred to a similar judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in CIT v. Roshan Singh Makker [2006] 287 ITR 160 (P & H), which held that the surcharge proviso would not apply if the search was conducted before June 1, 2002. The Madras High Court, in a separate case, CIT v. Neotech Co. (Firm) [2007] 291 ITR 27 (Mad), confirmed this interpretation that surcharge was not applicable to block assessments for searches conducted before the proviso's introduction. In the present case, the search took place in November 2000, before the proviso's enactment in June 2002. Therefore, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the appeal by the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the non-retrospective application of the surcharge proviso and concluded that no surcharge was applicable to block assessments conducted before June 1, 2002.
|
