2017 (1) TMI 1596

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . MENON, SMT.MEERA V.MENON For the RESPONDENT : SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC JUDGMENT The petitioners herein are aggrieved by the orders passed in the interlocutory applications filed in an appeal before the first Appellate Authority. The assessment years in all the cases are of the years from 2013-14 to 2016-17. The allegations against all the th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sel for the respondent however relies on clause(b) of paragraph 4, wherein, a blanket stay of the demand itself is mandated, when there is a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court or the jurisdictional High Court, in favour of the assesse. 3. The decision of the Allahabad High Court in Jagran Prakashan ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) [(2012) 345 ITR 288 (All)] is relied on by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... terfered with. In such circumstance, the assessee would be required to make payment of atleast 15% of the disputed demand, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, failing which, the recovery proceedings shall continue. The facts and figures in all the writ petitions are almost similar and the same order shall regulate payment in all of them. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X